|
Figure 4. A. C. khorgossi (Alpheraky, 1882), medial part of the antenna, with thin and asymmetrical bilateral processes, with strong sensilla chaetica in terminal position, and numerous fine, long sensilla trichoidea, 60× magnification; B. C. khorgossi (Alpheraky, 1882), elongate dorsal processes with strong sensilla chaetica in terminal position, and numerous fine, long sensilla trichoidea, being curved in subterminal position, 150× magnification; C. C. khorgossi (Alpheraky, 1882), shorter ventral processes with shorter sensilla chaetica in terminal position, and numerous fine, long sensilla trichoidea, 150× magnification; D. C. khorgossi (Alpheraky, 1882), terminal part of the dorsal processes with strong sensilla chaetica, striated longitudinally, and with long, thin sensilla trichoidea, 300× magnification; E. C. khorgossi (Alpheraky, 1882), ventral processes with strong, curved sensilla chaetica, with long and fine sensilla trichoidea, 300× magnification; F. C. khorgossi (Alpheraky, 1882), part of the stalk with different sensilla, densely covered by narrow, acute sensilla coeloconica, 1000× magnification. |
||
| Part of: Varga Z, Ronkay L, Rákosy L (2023) Differentiation in the ultrastructure of pectiniform antennae in species groups of the genus Ctenoceratoda Varga, 1992 (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). Contributions to Entomology 73(1): 95-107. https://doi.org/10.3897/contrib.entomol.73.e104072 |