Research Article |
Corresponding author: Ian Wallace ( lancschesh@hotmail.com ) Academic editor: Simon Vitecek
© 2023 Ian Wallace.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Wallace I (2023) The behaviour of recently-hatched caddis larvae from temporary water bodies in the British Isles. Contributions to Entomology 73(2): 147-150. https://doi.org/10.3897/contrib.entomol.73.e109786
|
Caddisflies use four basic methods to ensure that newly-hatched larvae become aquatic insects.
One is to lay the eggs underwater so larvae can start a free life immediately after hatching.
Another method is to lay the eggs above water and the hatched larvae fall or wriggle into the water.
Caddisflies from waters that dry out in summer often have a female diapause gradually becoming sexually mature and often do not lay their clutches until late summer or autumn, when rising water levels flood the eggs. The hatched larvae develop into pupae by March-May, from which adult caddisflies hatch again emergence beginning in spring.
Some caddisflies from waters that dry out lay in summer and those eggs hatch soon after laying so it is as a larva that they survive the dry period.
behaviour, Britain, eggs, larvae, early instars, Trichoptera
During caddis surveys in July, the Wallace family (Ian, Brenda, Graham and Matt) have come across limnephilid egg masses which look like those of the usual type for temporary waterbodies in sites which held no free water. Limnephilus luridus Curtis and Rhadicoleptus alpestris (Kolenati) were the species concerned. Captive females of the phryganeid Hagenella clathrata (Kolenati) also from peat bogs, lay at that time too, as does Limnephilus pati O’Connor from fens. Finding egg-masses in July in sites such as these challenges the classic model. The females involved must have had only a short diapause or probably none at all for Rhadicoleptus (Hiley, 1978) and Hagenella.
More significantly different is that the larvae escaped from the egg jelly of collected and captive-laid masses before the time water would have returned to their site. However, it is not known if these summer-laid egg masses could survive with their larvae in situ, until autumn, as collecting them and examining them could have disturbed their equilibrium and induced larvae to move and initiate hatching which involves liquefying the jelly.
In Glyphotaelius pellucidus (Retzius), the liquefaction of the egg jelly and subsequent escape of the larvae from it have been mentioned several times, for example,
Micropterna lateralis (Stephens) has been observed adopting a different strategy for passing summer. Larvae were found in ditches that dried-up over summer. In captivity, these pupated and adults emerged in May before a time when the water had completely dried up in their habitat. However, the adults did not diapause after emergence, but mated and laid rather soft jelly egg masses around stones in their rearing tank. The eggs developed and the larvae hatched and they could be reared to a larger stage. However, in the field, their waterbodies dried up.
An “experiment” was subsequently devised as follows.
In early June, two hatching egg masses, some of whose larvae had made cases, together with the water from their rearing washing-up bowl, were poured into a plant pot of garden soil which was placed in the shade and sporadically watered over the summer. In early September, the soil was submerged in a large bowl of water which was kept aerated. From an estimated 200 larvae poured into the pot of garden soil, around 20 emerged from the soil after re-wetting and subsequently developed; this may seem a small proportion, but the larvae had little time to position themselves in the soil.
Bogs and fens would seem to have a very amenable damp substratum for survival of small larvae. The sites may actually have the disadvantage of being too wet for temporary water-body egg masses, as that would probably cause the larvae to escape even if it was just into a water film (
Early laying and early hatching do not seem to apply to all individuals.
Many limnephilids of permanent waters lay eggs near the water’s edge or on riparian vegetation and rely on hatching larvae falling in or waves or a slight water level rise to cover them and wash larvae into the water. They too must, on occasions, hatch before being continuously submerged, due to egg mass disintegration or a flooding event and would need to have a suitable strategy to survive in soil. The egg-laying site preferences of aquatic British Limnephilidae and Phryganeidae are shown in Table
Preferred egg-laying sites of aquatic British Limnephilidae and Phryganeidae.
Group 1 laying underwater or into water |
All Phryganeidae, except Hagenella clathrata and Trichostegia minor; Apatania muliebris; A. auricula? and A. wallengreni?; Drusus annulatus; Ecclisopteryx dalecarlica; Anabolia nervosa; Halesus radiatus; H. digitatus?; Hydatophylax infumatus?; Melampophylax mucoreus? Mesophylax impunctatus?; Micropterna lateralis, M. sequax?; Potamophylax species. |
Group 2 laying above or by the side of permanent water |
Chaetopteryx villosa; Glyphotaelius pellucidus; Halesus radiatus; Limnephilus affinis; L. binotatus?; L. borealis?; L. centralis mountain pools; L. decipiens; L. exricatus; L. fuscicornis?; L. hirsutus?; L. ignavus?; L. lunatus; L. marmoratus; L. nigriceps; L. pati? L. politus; L. rhombicus; L. stigma mountain pools; L. subcentralis; Micropterna species ?; Nemotaulius punctatolineatus. |
Group 3 laying well away from free water |
Hagenella clathrata summer hatcher; Trichostegia minor; Ironoquia dubia; Anabolia brevipennis; Glyphotaelius pellucidus; Grammotaulius nigropunctatus; G. nitidus?; Limnephilus affinis; L. auricula; L. bipunctatus; L. centralis; L. elegans summer hatcher?; L. flavicornis; L. griseus; L. hirsutus; L. incisus; L. lunatus; L. luridus summer hatcher on occasions; L. marmoratus summer hatcher on occasions; L. pati summer hatcher; L. sparsus; L. stigma; L. tauricus; L. vittatus; Rhadicoleptus alpestris summer hatcher; Mesophylax aspersus; Stenophylax species. |
The in-substratum behaviour of recently-hatched caddis larvae has not been studied. For example, do they make a case, do they burrow into the substratum and do they have a different physiology to larger larvae? Response of cased caddis larvae to drying has not been studied often. Wichard (1989) gives a first overview of caddisflies from waters that dry up in summer in Central Europe (12 Limnephilidae and 1 Phryganeidae). Wichard believes that the ability to respond to low oxygen levels by producing more gill filaments could be significant in these challenging waterbodies. Survival is reported for M. lateralis by
The Annulipalpian species, Plectrocnemia conspersa (Curtis), utilises temporary streams and marshes. Their eggs do not seem well adapted to drying, but a strategy could be hatching from autumn- or spring-laid eggs before the waterbody dries and passing summer in the substratum as a small larva.
The behaviour and physiology of recently-hatched caddis larvae has been little studied. Species may adopt several strategies to ensure the survival of their larvae.
The author has no funding to report.
The author has declared that no competing interests exist.
The author acknowledges the help of his family in fieldwork.